Two dogs can eat the same food, receive the same probiotic, and still show completely different gut health outcomes. One thrives. The other struggles with loose stools, low energy, and chronic digestive sensitivity. For years, this was attributed to individual variation or the catch-all explanation of “sensitive stomach.” Science now offers a more precise answer: their DNA.
Canine nutrigenomics, the study of how a dog’s genetic makeup interacts with nutrition to influence health outcomes, is one of the most rapidly developing fields in veterinary science. While much of the attention in this space has focused on inherited disease risks, the implications for everyday gut health protocols are equally significant and far less explored.
This article draws on peer-reviewed research to explain how breed and genetic background shape microbiome composition, enzyme expression, inflammatory tone, and microbial metabolite production, and what that means for building an optimal gut health protocol for your individual dog.
Key Takeaways
- Breed-specific genetic differences in gut microbiome composition have been confirmed in controlled studies where diet was held constant.
- The AMY2B gene, which governs starch-digesting enzyme production, varies significantly between breeds and individuals, with direct implications for carbohydrate and fibre tolerance.
- German Shepherd Dogs carry specific genetic variants in immune receptor genes that predispose them to IBD-type gut inflammation, regardless of diet.
- The Norwegian Lundehund study provides direct evidence that host genetics, not diet or environment, drives microbiome dysbiosis in genetically vulnerable dogs.
- No single gut health protocol serves all dogs equally. Breed background is the logical starting point for tailoring nutrition and supplementation.
- The science does not make diet irrelevant. It explains why the same diet produces different results in different dogs, and where targeted intervention is most likely to help.
In This Guide:
How Breed and Genetic Background Shape the Gut Microbiome
The AMY2B Gene: Why Carbohydrate Tolerance Varies by Breed
Genetic Variants That Affect Gut Inflammation
The Norwegian Lundehund: Direct Evidence That Genetics Shapes the Gut
Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Individual Variation in Fibre Response
What This Means for Your Dog’s Gut Health Protocol
How Bonza Is Built Around This Principle
What Is Canine Nutrigenomics?
Nutrigenomics is the science of how genes and nutrients interact to influence health outcomes. In its canine application, it asks a specific question: does your dog’s genetic makeup change how food and supplements are processed, absorbed, and utilised at the cellular and microbial level? The answer, increasingly clearly, is yes.
Dogs have been selectively bred for thousands of years across wildly different environments and food landscapes. A sled dog bred for survival in the Arctic on a fat-rich, near-zero-carbohydrate diet has a fundamentally different nutritional history to a sheepdog shaped alongside agricultural communities in mainland Europe. These histories are written into the genome, and they do not simply disappear when a dog is fed a modern commercial diet.
Canine nutrigenomics sits at the intersection of three disciplines: genetics (what variants does this dog carry?), nutrition (what substrates are available?), and microbiology (how does the gut microbiome respond?). Understanding how these three interact is the foundation for moving beyond one-size-fits-all gut health advice.
It is also, it must be said, a field still in its formative stages. Most canine nutrigenomics research has accumulated only in the past decade. The findings reviewed in this article are robustly supported by current peer-reviewed evidence, but the full picture will only emerge as larger, multi-breed studies accumulate over coming years.
For a full overview of how the canine gut microbiome works, what disrupts it, and how to optimise it through nutrition, see our complete guide: Dog Gut Health: Their Most Important Health Asset
How Breed and Genetic Background Shape the Gut Microbiome
One of the most direct tests of whether genetics shapes the canine gut microbiome is to control for everything else and then compare breeds. A 2019 study did exactly that, comparing the fecal microbiomes of Maltese, Miniature Schnauzer, and Poodle dogs housed and fed under identical conditions. The results were unambiguous. Maltese dogs showed significantly lower relative abundance of Firmicutes and significantly higher Fusobacteria compared to the other two breeds. At genus level, five bacterial groups, including Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, and Turicibacter, differed significantly across the three breeds. Critically, none of these differences correlated with age, diet, sex, body weight, vaccination history, or parasite protection history.¹ The only remaining explanatory variable was genetic background.
Separate research comparing three working dog breeds, German Shepherd, Labrador Retriever, and Springer Spaniel, housed and managed under the same conditions, found that German Shepherds showed significantly higher alpha diversity than the other two breeds.² Alpha diversity, the richness and evenness of bacterial species within a single gut sample, is considered a marker of gut resilience and ecological stability. The higher diversity observed in the German Shepherd gut is a notable finding given that breed’s simultaneous predisposition to several gut disorders, and may reflect a more complex host-microbiome relationship in genetically predisposed individuals.
Body size also contributes to microbiome differences through a physiological mechanism. The more acidic intestinal environment created by fermentation in large dogs suppresses the growth of Proteobacteria, while smaller dogs with shorter intestines maintain a gut environment closer to neutral pH, which favours Proteobacteria proliferation.³ A high proportion of Proteobacteria is associated with dysbiosis, which may in part explain why small breeds often present differently in gut health contexts despite appearing nutritionally similar.
These findings collectively point to an important conclusion: the baseline microbiome a dog carries is not determined by diet alone. Genetics sets a compositional starting point, and diet, stress, age, and environment operate on top of that foundation. Understanding the genetic baseline is therefore the first step in understanding what a gut health protocol needs to achieve.¹⁵
The AMY2B Gene: Why Carbohydrate Tolerance Varies by Breed
One of the most well-documented genetic-nutrition interactions in dogs involves the AMY2B gene, which codes for pancreatic alpha-amylase, the enzyme responsible for starch digestion in the small intestine. During domestication, dogs underwent a dramatic expansion in the number of copies of this gene relative to their wolf ancestors. Wolves typically carry two copies of AMY2B. Dogs range from four to more than 30 copies, a variation that reflects a key evolutionary adaptation to the starchy food scraps of agricultural human communities.⁴
This expansion did not occur uniformly across all dog lineages. Research tracking AMY2B copy numbers across breeds worldwide found a clear correlation with ancestral dietary history. Breeds from historically high-starch agricultural environments, such as the Shar Pei and Pekingese, carried significantly higher mean copy numbers than breeds from populations with minimal agricultural exposure. In one study, high-starch-diet breeds carried a mean copy number of 10.9 compared to 7.4 in low-starch-diet breeds (P < 0.0001).⁵ Dogs associated with nomadic hunter-gatherer lifestyles, including the Siberian Husky and Greenland Sledge Dog, retained low AMY2B copy numbers, in some cases as few as two, the same as wolves.⁶
The gut health implications of AMY2B variation are direct. When starch is not adequately digested in the small intestine, it passes into the large intestine as undigested substrate. This shifts the fermentation load in the hindgut, altering the microbial populations that proliferate and the metabolites they produce. In dogs with lower amylase capacity, high-starch diets may generate greater gas production, altered short-chain fatty acid ratios, and a more proteolytic microbial environment, all conditions associated with gut imbalance.
A study examining AMY2B copy numbers across 20 dog breeds confirmed strong breed-dependent patterns, with breed origin accounting for 51.7% of AMY2B copy number variation (P < 0.0001).⁷ While the relationship between copy number and digestive efficiency is not perfectly linear, and individual variation within breeds exists, the overall pattern is consistent: breeds from high-starch ancestral environments carry greater starch-digesting capacity, and breeds from low-starch ancestral environments do not.
For the owner of a Siberian Husky, Alaskan Malamute, or Greenland Dog, this research suggests that high-starch diets may present a genuine digestive challenge regardless of ingredient quality. For breeds like the Labrador Retriever or Border Collie, shaped by agricultural environments across many generations, starch tolerance is likely greater, though still individual. The practical implication is not that Arctic breeds cannot eat any carbohydrate, but that the type, quantity, and digestibility of starch in their diet warrants more careful consideration.
Genetic Variants That Affect Gut Inflammation
German Shepherds, TLR Variants, and Gut Immune Tone
The gut immune system must continuously distinguish between harmless commensal bacteria and genuine threats, a task managed in large part by pattern recognition receptors including Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In German Shepherd Dogs, specific genetic variants in the TLR-4 and TLR-5 genes, which encode key mucosal pattern recognition receptors for bacterial detection, have been significantly associated with inflammatory bowel disease susceptibility.⁸ These variants appear to alter how the gut immune system responds to normal commensal bacteria, generating a heightened inflammatory tone that, in the presence of additional dietary or environmental triggers, can tip into chronic enteropathy.
This is not unique to dogs. Analogous TLR polymorphisms are associated with IBD in humans, and the mechanistic parallel between human and canine gut immune dysfunction is well-established in the research literature. For German Shepherd owners, this genetic profile means that even a well-managed diet may not be sufficient on its own: the gut immune system of a genetically predisposed dog starts from a different baseline, and protocols that specifically support mucosal immune regulation are more likely to be effective than those focused on nutrition alone.
Beyond German Shepherds, breed-specific IBD predispositions are well-catalogued across the veterinary literature. Boxers and French Bulldogs are predisposed to histiocytic ulcerative colitis. Soft Coated Wheaten Terriers carry susceptibility to protein-losing enteropathy and protein-losing nephropathy. Basenjis develop immunoproliferative enteropathy. Irish Setters are prone to gluten-sensitive enteropathy. In each case, the shared thread is a genetic variant that alters either the gut immune response or the integrity of the epithelial barrier.⁹
EPI: When Genetics Disrupts Digestive Enzyme Production
Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) provides perhaps the clearest example of genetics directly disrupting gut function through an enzymatic mechanism. EPI occurs when the pancreas fails to produce adequate digestive enzymes, leading to maldigestion, nutrient malabsorption, and secondary gut dysbiosis. German Shepherd Dogs are by far the most commonly affected breed, with a polygenic inheritance model proposed for the pancreatic acinar atrophy that underlies most canine EPI cases.¹⁰
Research on the fecal microbiome of EPI-affected dogs found a distinct microbial profile compared to healthy dogs, including significant decreases in Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, two bacterial families strongly associated with short-chain fatty acid production and gut barrier maintenance.¹¹ EPI is an extreme example, but it illustrates a broader principle that applies even in dogs without full-blown disease: when genetics alters digestive enzyme availability upstream, the downstream effect on the gut microbiome is measurable and clinically meaningful.
The Norwegian Lundehund: Direct Evidence That Genetics Shapes the Gut
The most compelling evidence that host genetics directly shapes gut health comes from a natural study of one of the world’s most genetically unusual dog breeds.
The Norwegian Lundehund is a highly inbred spitz breed with an effective population size of just 13 individuals, the result of a near-extinction event in the 1960s that reduced the entire breeding population to five dogs. The breed suffers a high incidence of Lundehund syndrome, a severe protein-losing enteropathy that causes chronic digestive disease and reduces lifespan. An outcrossing programme with the Norwegian Buhund, Norrbottenspets, and Icelandic Sheepdog was established to reintroduce genetic diversity.
A 2023 study examined the fecal microbiomes of 73 dogs: 45 purebred Lundehunds, 8 first-generation crosses with the Buhund (F1), and 20 first-generation backcrosses (F2). Purebred Lundehunds showed a highly variable microbiome characterised by an elevated Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and overgrowth of Streptococcus bovis/equinus complex, a known pathobiont associated with several diseases. The F1 and F2 generations showed a more balanced, health-associated microbiome composition with a lower Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and greater abundance of health-associated genera including Blautia and Fusobacterium.¹²
Critically, the researchers tracked diet, cat ownership, farm living, and probiotic use across all 73 dogs, and found no evidence that any of these environmental factors explained the microbiome differences. The shift in microbial composition tracked with genetic background alone. When genetic diversity was restored through crossbreeding, the microbiome improved. Not because the diet changed, but because the host genome changed.
For dog owners, the Lundehund finding is a powerful illustration of a principle that extends far beyond this rare breed: the genetic background your dog inherited is actively shaping the microbial community in their gut, every single day, regardless of what they eat. Diet can modulate that community; it cannot override the genetic starting point.
Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Individual Variation in Fibre Response
Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), primarily acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are the primary end products of microbial fermentation of dietary fibre in the hindgut. Butyrate in particular is the main energy source for colonocytes, supports epithelial barrier integrity, regulates intestinal immune function, and exerts anti-inflammatory effects at the gut lining. Decreased SCFA concentrations have been documented in dogs with chronic enteropathy, with reduced Bacteroidetes abundance, the primary acetate and propionate producers, correlating with lower SCFA output.¹³
What is less widely discussed is that SCFA production capacity varies considerably between individual dogs, even when receiving the same fibre source at the same inclusion level. Research on canine fibre response found that even within a seemingly homogeneous population, the benefit received from dietary fibre was personalised, reflecting specific fibre-microbe-host interactions rather than a consistent population-wide outcome.¹⁴
This individual variation in fibre fermentation response is, in part, a downstream consequence of microbiome composition, which, as established above, is itself shaped partly by host genetics. A dog whose genetic profile predisposes to lower Bacteroidetes abundance may generate less acetate and propionate from the same prebiotic dose than a genetically distinct dog consuming identical quantities. This is not a theoretical claim; it is an extension of the well-supported finding that community composition determines fermentation efficiency.
The practical implication is that prebiotic fibre sources are not interchangeable in their outcomes across all dogs. The type of fibre matters, the quantity matters, and so does the resident microbial community available to ferment it. Understanding a dog’s likely microbiome baseline, informed in part by breed genetic background, is therefore relevant to selecting the most appropriate fibre source and format.
What This Means for Your Dog’s Gut Health Protocol
The research reviewed in this article does not suggest that genetics determines gut health fate. Diet, supplementation, stress management, and veterinary care all remain critical and modifiable levers. What the science does establish is that genetics sets the starting conditions, and ignoring those conditions means building a protocol on incomplete information.
Here is how breed background can logically inform a more targeted gut health approach.
Carbohydrate and Starch Load
Breeds with low ancestral AMY2B copy numbers, broadly including Arctic breeds such as the Siberian Husky, Alaskan Malamute, and Greenland Dog, as well as the dingo, may handle starch-heavy diets less efficiently. For these dogs, reducing dietary starch load and prioritising complex, fermentable fibre sources to support hindgut microbial balance is a genetics-informed approach. A multi-component fibre matrix, rather than a single high-dose prebiotic, reduces the risk of rapid fermentation and gas production in dogs that may already have altered hindgut dynamics.
Probiotic Strain Selection
Breeds with known gut immune vulnerabilities, German Shepherds in particular, may benefit from probiotic strains with documented anti-inflammatory and mucosal immunomodulatory properties. Not all probiotic strains are equivalent in their effects at the gut lining. Reviewing evidence for specific strain mechanisms, rather than selecting a product on colony-forming unit count alone, is a more genetics-informed approach.
Gut Barrier Support
In breeds predisposed to epithelial barrier dysfunction, including those with TLR variant susceptibility, nutrients and substrates that support tight junction integrity and colonocyte energy supply become particularly relevant. Butyrate-producing fibre sources are the most direct nutritional intervention available for colonocyte health and barrier function.
Ongoing Monitoring
Given that genetic predispositions interact with environmental and dietary triggers, more regular monitoring of faecal consistency, energy levels, coat quality, and bodyweight in predisposed breeds provides an early signal of emerging dysbiosis before it progresses to clinical disease. Predisposition does not mean certainty; it means the threshold for action should be lower.
It is important to be clear that genetic background provides a starting frame, not a precise prescription. Individual dogs within breeds vary considerably, and no protocol should be implemented on the basis of breed alone without veterinary input, particularly in dogs already showing gut symptoms.
How Bonza Is Built Around This Principle
The premise of One Gut. Whole Dog. is that the gut is not an isolated organ but the primary regulatory hub through which every other body system is influenced. The nutrigenomics research reviewed here reinforces that premise and adds a layer of specificity: the gut’s regulatory capacity is partly determined by the genetic background of the individual dog.
Bonza’s Superfoods and Ancient Grains complete food is formulated around cold extrusion below 70 degrees Celsius, preserving the enzymatic activity and phytonutrient integrity of whole-food ingredients in a format that supports digestion across a wide range of breed backgrounds, including dogs with lower starch-digesting capacity. The inclusion of a complex, multi-component fibre matrix provides graduated fermentation across different regions of the hindgut rather than the rapid, localised fermentation that can challenge sensitive digestive systems.
The Biotics Triad within Bonza’s Belly supplement combines prebiotics, probiotics, and postbiotics in a format designed to support the gut microbiome at multiple levels simultaneously. For dogs in predisposed breeds, where the genetic starting point may make microbiome balance harder to maintain, a protocol that addresses substrate availability, microbial seeding, and immunomodulation in combination is more likely to achieve lasting gut health than any single intervention in isolation.
The full Bioactive Bites supplement range extends this principle across each of the major gut-axis systems: immune, metabolic, joint, skin, brain, longevity, heart, and liver. The goal in every case is the same: support the gut so effectively that the whole dog benefits, regardless of their genetic starting point.
Safety and Limitations
The field of canine nutrigenomics is advancing rapidly but remains in its early stages. Most breed-level microbiome studies use relatively small sample sizes, and comprehensive multi-breed data across the full diversity of the domestic dog does not yet exist. The AMY2B research is among the most robust in the field, but the precise relationship between copy number and digestive efficiency continues to be refined, and individual variation within breeds means copy number alone cannot predict clinical outcomes for a specific dog.
Canine DNA testing for nutrition purposes is available commercially, but the clinical utility of these tests varies considerably. At present, breed background and known breed-specific health predispositions remain more actionable for most dog owners than commercially available genetic panels. A veterinary nutritionist or integrative vet can help interpret any test results in clinical context.
No nutritional or supplementation protocol should be implemented on the basis of genetic background alone. If your dog is showing chronic gastrointestinal symptoms, a veterinary assessment to rule out underlying disease is always the first and most important step.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Multiple controlled studies, including research where dogs of different breeds were fed identical diets under identical conditions, have confirmed that microbiome composition differs significantly between breeds. Genetics is one of the primary factors shaping that difference, alongside diet, age, and environment.
Commercial canine DNA tests can provide interesting information, but their clinical utility for specific nutrition guidance is still limited. For most owners, breed background and known breed-specific predispositions are more reliably actionable than the outputs of current nutritional genetic panels. If you do pursue testing, a veterinary nutritionist can help interpret results in context.
German Shepherd Dogs, Boxers, French Bulldogs, Soft Coated Wheaten Terriers, Basenjis, Irish Setters, and Norwegian Lundehunds are among the breeds with well-documented genetic predispositions to gut disorders. Sled and Arctic breeds including the Siberian Husky and Greenland Dog may face additional challenges with starch-heavy diets due to low AMY2B copy numbers. That said, any breed, and any individual dog, can develop gut health issues: predisposition is not predetermination.
Diet does not override genetics, but it can work with or against it. A well-designed nutrition and supplementation protocol can significantly reduce the expression of genetic gut vulnerabilities by supporting microbiome balance, lowering inflammatory load, and providing the substrates the gut lining needs to function well. Genetics sets the starting conditions; nutrition shapes what happens from there. The two are not in competition, they are partners.
Related Articles
- The Dog Gut Microbiome: Vital Key to Dog Health
- The Gut-Immune Axis in Dogs: How Gut Health Supports Immune Health
- The Gut-Longevity Axis in Dogs: Key To Improved Healthspan
- Best Probiotics for Dogs: A Canine Nutritionist’s Guide to Real Gut Impact
- Best Prebiotics for Dogs: Canine Nutritionist’s Complete Guide
- Gut Health Supplements for Dogs: Why Probiotics Alone Are Not Enough
References
- Reddy KE, Kim HR, Jeong JY, So KM, Lee S, Ji SY, Kim M, Lee HJ, Lee S, Kim KH, Kim M. Impact of breed on the fecal microbiome of dogs under the same dietary condition. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;29(12):1947-1956. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1906.06048. PMID: 31601060.
- Li Z, Sun Q, Li Y, Guan Z, Wei J, Li B, Liu K, Shao D, Mi R, Liu H, Qiu Y, Ma Z. Analysis and comparison of gut microbiome in young detection dogs. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:872230. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.872230. PMID: 35516435. PMC: 9063727.
- Deschamps C, Humbert D, Zentek J, Denis S, Priymenko N, Apper E, Blanquet-Diot S. From Chihuahua to Saint-Bernard: how did digestion and microbiota evolve with dog sizes. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(13):5086-5102. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.72770. PMID: 35982892. PMC: 9379419.
- Axelsson E, Ratnakumar A, Arendt ML, Maqbool K, Webster MT, Perloski M, Liberg O, Arnemo JM, Hedhammar A, Lindblad-Toh K. The genomic signature of dog domestication reveals adaptation to a starch-rich diet. Nature. 2013;495(7441):360-364. doi: 10.1038/nature11837. PMID: 23354050.
- Reiter T, Jagoda E, Capellini TD. Dietary variation and evolution of gene copy number among dog breeds. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(2):e0148899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148899. PMID: 26863414. PMC: 4749313.
- Arendt M, Cairns KM, Ballard JWO, Savolainen P, Axelsson E. Diet adaptation in dog reflects spread of prehistoric agriculture. Heredity (Edinb). 2016;117(5):301-306. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.48. PMID: 27353047. PMC: 5061917.
- Arendt ML, Fall T, Lindblad-Toh K, Axelsson E. Amylase activity is associated with AMY2B copy numbers in dog: implications for dog domestication, diet and diabetes. Anim Genet. 2014;45(5):716-722. doi: 10.1111/age.12179. PMID: 24975239. PMC: 4329415.
- Kathrani A, House A, Catchpole B, Murphy A, German A, Werling D, Allenspach K. Polymorphisms in the TLR4 and TLR5 gene are significantly associated with inflammatory bowel disease in German shepherd dogs. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e15740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015740. PMID: 21203467. PMC: 3009732.
- Kathrani A, Werling D, Allenspach K. Canine breeds at high risk of developing inflammatory bowel disease in the south-eastern UK. Vet Rec. 2011;169(24):635. doi: 10.1136/vr.d5380. PMID: 21896567.
- Westermarck E, Wiberg M. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2003;33(5):1165-1179. doi: 10.1016/S0195-5616(03)00057-X. PMID: 14552163.
- Isaiah A, Parambeth JC, Steiner JM, Lidbury JA, Suchodolski JS. The fecal microbiome of dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Anaerobe. 2017;45:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.02.010. PMID: 28223257.
- Melis C, Billing AM, Wold P-A, Ludington WB. Gut microbiome dysbiosis is associated with host genetics in the Norwegian Lundehund. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1209158. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1209158. PMID: 37405168. PMC: 10315540.
- Minamoto Y, Otoni CC, Steelman SM, Hamamoto-Hardman B, Weidner N, Weinstein NM, Suchodolski JS. Alteration of the fecal microbiota and serum metabolite profiles in dogs with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease. Gut Microbes. 2015;6(1):33-47. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2014.997612. PMID: 25559827. PMC: 6639498.
- Bhosle A, Jackson MI, Walsh AM, Franzosa EA, Badri DV, Huttenhower C. Response of the gut microbiome and metabolome to dietary fiber in healthy dogs. mSystems. 2025;10(1):e00452-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00452-24. PMID: 39714168. PMC: 11748496.
- Kim H, Chae Y, Cho JH, et al. Understanding the diversity and roles of the canine gut microbiome. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2025;16(1):95. Published 2025 Jul 5. doi:10.1186/s40104-025-01235-4
Editorial Information
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Published | March 2026 |
| Last Updated | March 2026 – This article will be reviewed and updated when significant new evidence becomes available in canine nutrigenomics research. |
| Reviewed by | Veterinary Advisory Board |
| Next Review | March2027 |
| Author | Glendon Lloyd, Dip. Canine Nutrition (Dist.), Dip. Dog Nutrigenomics (Dist.), Founder, Bonza |
| Disclaimer | This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute veterinary advice. Always consult a qualified veterinarian before making changes to your dog’s diet or supplement regimen. |
